For patrons looking for a fun-to-drive compact SUV, the Hyundai Venue N Line and Skoda Kylaq are among the many greatest choices of the section. Each include direct-injection turbo-petrol engines and snappy computerized transmissions, however which ones is quicker in the actual world? We put the Venue N Line and Kylaq via our instrumented efficiency checks to seek out out.
Hyundai Venue N Line vs Skoda Kylaq specs
| Venue N Line | Kylaq | |
| Engine | 1.0-litre, turbo-petrol | 1.0-litre, turbo-petrol |
| Cylinder rely | 3 | 3 |
| Energy (hp) | 120 | 115 |
| Torque (Nm) | 172 | 178 |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT | 6-speed AT |
| Drive structure | FWD | FWD |
The Venue N Line and Kylaq are powered by 1.0-litre three-cylinder direct-injection turbo-petrol engines. Whereas the Venue N Line makes 5hp extra, the Kylaq outputs 6Nm extra torque. One other main differentiator between the 2 are their computerized gearboxes. The Venue N Line comes with a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission, whereas the Kylaq contains a 6-speed torque converter.
Hyundai Venue N Line vs Skoda Kylaq 0-100kph occasions
| Venue N Line DCT | Kylaq AT | |
| 10kph (sec) | 0.91 | 0.74 |
| 20kph (sec) | 1.69 | 1.47 |
| 30kph (sec) | 2.44 | 2.27 |
| 40kph (sec) | 3.35 | 2.97 |
| 50kph (sec) | 4.40 | 4.18 |
| 60kph (sec) | 5.50 | 5.13 |
| 70kph (sec) | 6.71 | 6.34 |
| 80kph (sec) | 8.18 | 7.97 |
| 90kph (sec) | 9.88 | 9.83 |
| 100kph (sec) | 11.93 | 11.69 |
Accelerating from a standstill, the Kylaq edged forward of the Venue N Line, doubtless as a result of Skoda SUV’s increased torque output. The Kylaq stayed in first place all through the take a look at, however the hole between the 2 SUVs different fairly a bit at each velocity, with a most of 0.38 seconds at 40kph and a minimal of 0.05 seconds at 90kph.
Hyundai Venue N Line vs Skoda Kylaq rolling acceleration take a look at
|
20-80kph kickdown take a look at |
||
| Venue N Line DCT | Kylaq AT | |
| 30kph (sec) | 0.59 | 0.78 |
| 40kph (sec) | 1.47 | 1.57 |
| 50kph (sec) | 2.57 | 2.65 |
| 60kph (sec) | 3.54 | 3.75 |
| 70kph (sec) | 4.74 | 4.98 |
| 80kph (sec) | 6.21 | 6.38 |
Within the 20-80kph kickdown dash, the Venue N Line’s snappy DCT helped it safe a victory. The Hyundai SUV maintained its lead in any respect speeds, with the Kylaq coming the closest to it on the 50kph mark – a delta of simply 0.08 seconds – earlier than falling behind once more and finally ending 0.17 seconds slower than the Venue N Line.
|
40-100kph kickdown take a look at |
||
| Venue N Line DCT | Kylaq AT | |
| 50kph (sec) | 1.10 | 1.14 |
| 60kph (sec) | 2.35 | 2.24 |
| 70kph (sec) | 3.50 | 3.53 |
| 80kph (sec) | 4.91 | 5.15 |
| 90kph (sec) | 6.56 | 6.86 |
| 100kph (sec) | 8.34 | 8.72 |
The 40-100kph kickdown take a look at was extra attention-grabbing. The Venue N Line was marginally faster to 50kph, however the Kylaq managed to drag forward by the 60kph mark. Then, the Venue N Line was again in first place at 70kph, the place it stayed up till 100kph.
Hyundai Venue N Line vs Skoda Kylaq turbo-petrol computerized costs
| Worth (Rs, lakh) | |
| Venue N Line DCT | 11.56-15.49* |
| Kylaq AT | 9.25-12.99 |
*Excluding premiums for dual-tone finishes and beauty packages.
On the base stage, the Venue N Line DCT is Rs 2.5 lakh dearer than the Kylaq AT, and their top-spec variations characteristic an similar value distinction too. Each compact SUVs commerce punches by way of real-world efficiency, so the Kylaq’s considerably decrease pricing makes it a greater deal. That stated, the N Line’s turbo-petrol DCT powertrain is on the market for the usual Venue too, priced at Rs 10.92 lakh-14.65 lakh. Setting apart the racier styling components, the N Line isn’t any completely different to the vanilla Venue, so it can save you a substantial quantity when you do not want the sportiness.
All costs are ex-showroom, India.