The Gujarat Excessive Courtroom on Monday dismissed as withdrawn an attraction filed by former India cricketer and Lok Sabha MP Yusuf Pathan towards a single-judge order that had described him as an “encroacher” on a chunk of presidency land in Vadodara.Pathan’s lawyer, Shalin Mehta, sought permission to withdraw the plea earlier than a division bench comprising Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice DN Ray. The lawyer instructed the courtroom that Pathan’s declare over the land was nonetheless being pursued beneath a state authorities coverage.The division bench subsequently dismissed the attraction as withdrawn.
Pathan had challenged land allotment rejection
The 43-year-old had approached the Excessive Courtroom difficult a single-judge order that upheld the Gujarat authorities’s determination to reject his request for allotment of the 978-square metre plot owned by the Vadodara Municipal Company (VMC).Pathan had claimed the land beneath a state coverage relevant to worldwide cricketers.Throughout an earlier listening to, Pathan had instructed the courtroom that he was pursuing his declare beneath a state authorities scheme and was given 4 weeks to pursue the matter. The Excessive Courtroom had additionally warned that he may face increased cost of damages if he took longer to vacate the plot.Throughout Monday’s proceedings, Mehta stated they had been awaiting a response from the VMC however had not acquired one.“As a result of we’re saying that there’s a round which permits worldwide cricketers to be given a plot. I feel I’ll withdraw as a result of I haven’t heard something from them (VMC). I’ve taken directions from my shopper…whether it is to occur, it would occur outdoors the courtroom; in any other case it gained’t occur,” Mehta submitted.With the attraction withdrawn, Pathan’s try to problem the sooner courtroom order by means of the division bench has come to an finish.
VMC had requested Pathan to vacate plot
The dispute dates again to 2024, when the Gujarat authorities rejected Pathan’s request for allotment of the plot. Regardless of the rejection, he continued to occupy the land.After Pathan was elected from the Baharampur Lok Sabha seat in West Bengal on a Trinamool Congress (TMC) ticket in 2024, the VMC issued him a discover asking him to vacate the land. Pathan refused and challenged the matter in courtroom.The Excessive Courtroom had beforehand taken a robust view of his occupation of the plot. Throughout a listening to on June 8, the courtroom got here down closely on Pathan over the alleged “encroachment” and orally questioned how he may enter and occupy the land with out finishing the required formalities.The matter now strikes outdoors the courtroom as Pathan continues to pursue his declare beneath the state coverage.